Re: Nancy Leider, Anti-American, etc

In Article <m3y9n3486c.fsf@c244s14h6.upc.chello.no> Jon Kvebaek wrote:
> But do you really think a lasting decline would benefit a
> conspiracy of bankers as described in Nancy's insane rants?
> We all lose - persons, companies (look at the insurance and airport
> industry) and banks.  Nancy's theories are too stupid.
>
> The only "conspiracy" I can see here is that of a small group of
> organisations/individuals, not a slew of European banks.  Only a
> right-wing american conspiracy kook could come up with such
> ideas. Like Nancy Lieder.

More .. on the Brits and ZetaTalk ACCURACY.  All this is to encourage
you'all to LOOK for the inbound Planet X per the Zeta given coordinates
(http://www.zetatalk.com/theword/tword03m.htm), as they are not trolling on
this or on any matter. To repeat, briefly, the background on this latest
ZetaTalk Accuracy tidbit.

On Sept 13th, the Zetas said:

    The target was the banking systems holding the US and
    their elite and wealthy ABOVE those in Europe, in the
    arrogant manner Bush and his masters have employed
    of late. To understand the main target, and the support
    relationships causing a relative collapse among the
    wealthy and holdings of the US elite versus others, one
    needs to know the complex and mostly secret relationships
    between bonding banks, new issue of stock, loans between
    banks and governments, agreements with the Fed, and
    who holds what holdings privately or publicly!
        ZetaTalk™, Attack on America
            (http://www.zetatalk.com/govmt/g127.htm)

On Sept 14th, they revealed (via me).

    The Troubled Times tt-watch mailing list was begging to
    know WHICH bank, and I shared what the Zetas had been
    telling me, that it was an English bank.
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tt-watch/message/6277

              From:  Nancy Lieder <zetatalk@zetatalk.com>
              Date:  Fri Sep 14, 2001  10:55 am
              Subject:  Re: [tt-watch] So is Bank of America behind it?

              I'm told we should look to England.

And now the latest on the Brits being snuggy with Bin Laden:

  Bin Laden's links with the UK date back to the 1980s
  http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk/newsid_1564000/1564626.stm

    ..  his connection to Britain is so strong that in recent
    years Washington faced calls to add the UK to its black
    list of states sponsoring terrorism. And some Arab
    states now under suspicion accused Britain of giving
    harbour to Muslim militants.  So open was Bin
    Laden's presence that for most of the 1990s he
    maintained an office in London, named the Advisory
    and Reformation Committee. ... Like Beirut in the
    1970s, London became a safe haven from which to
    broaden the Jihad armed struggle from Afghanistan
    to the secular regimes of the Arab world. ... They
    were attracted, they said, by Britain's "traditions of
    democracy and justice". Most lauded violence.  Arab
    governments fighting armed Islamic insurgencies
    saw things differently. Some suspected that, as in
    Afghanistan, Britain was continuing to use the
    Islamists for its foreign policy goals. ...